Affect

PANAS — Right Now (State Affect, 20 items)

The 20-item Positive and Negative Affect Schedule, administered as a state measure. Indicates how you feel at this moment. Scores Positive and Negative Affect independently, each with population percentiles from a published normative sample. Free.

✓ Free — no account required for report

Positive Affect

Alert, attentive, enthusiastic, excited, inspired, interested, proud, determined, strong, active.

Negative Affect

Distressed, upset, guilty, scared, hostile, irritable, ashamed, nervous, jittery, afraid.

At a glance

Items
20 items
Response
5-point intensity
Time
~3 minutes
Scales
PA & NA
Time frame
Right now
Norms
N = 660

About the PANAS

Watson, Clark, and Tellegen (1988) developed the PANAS to measure the two dominant dimensions of affective experience. Positive Affect (PA) reflects the extent to which a person feels enthusiastic, active, and alert — high PA is a state of energy and pleasurable engagement; low PA is characterized by sadness and lethargy. Negative Affect (NA) is a general dimension of subjective distress encompassing a range of aversive states including fear, anger, guilt, and nervousness; low NA corresponds to calm and serenity.

Crucially, PA and NA are largely independent dimensions — not opposite ends of a single scale — so a person can simultaneously score high on both, low on both, or high on one and low on the other. This two-factor structure is one of the most replicated findings in affective science.

The state version asks you to rate each word to describe how you feel right now, at this moment. Use it to capture mood at a specific point in time or to track affect changes across situations or over a day.

Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063–1070.

Report includes

PA and NA raw scores (range 10–50 each), population percentile, and a 90% confidence range. The normative comparison is from Watson et al. (1988), Table 1 (state norms: PA M = 29.7, SD = 7.9; NA M = 14.8, SD = 5.4; N = 660 college students). Because this is a self-selected college sample, percentiles should be interpreted relative to that reference group, not the general adult population. The 90% CI uses the standard error of measurement computed from the published lower-bound reliability (PA α = .86, NA α = .84).

Watson, Clark & Tellegen (1988), Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063–1070, Table 1 — 'Moment' ('right now') instruction, undergraduate reference sample. Positive Affect: M = 29.7, SD = 7.9 (N = 660); Negative Affect: M = 14.8, SD = 5.4 (N = 660). Confidence range uses the standard error of measurement from the published Cronbach's α lower bounds (PA ≥ .86, NA ≥ .84).