Sample report — illustrative responses, not a real result

The scores and narrative below are produced by the real ImplicitifyAI scoring engine from a fixed set of example responses. Nothing here is tied to a real person, and nothing is stored.

Assessment Report

Anxious-Preoccupied Attachment — Sample Profile

Completed on 10 June 2026 · 12 items answered

Your Scores

Each bar shows where your responses fall on the 5-point scale, expressed as a percentage of the possible range.

Attachment Anxiety Higher 100% · mean 5.00 (6 items)

Attachment Anxiety captures how much you worry about rejection or abandonment in close relationships. Your answers place you in the higher range (100%), where you tend to seek reassurance and to worry about a partner's availability.

Attachment Avoidance Lower 25% · mean 2.00 (6 items)

Your responses put Attachment Avoidance toward the lower end (25%). This trait reflects how uncomfortable you are with closeness and dependence; at this standing, you tend to be comfortable with closeness and with depending on others.

What this means

Within this profile, your relative high point is Attachment Anxiety (how much you worry about rejection or abandonment in close relationships) at 100%, and your relative low point is Attachment Avoidance (how uncomfortable you are with closeness and dependence) at 25%. These are standings within your own responses — a self-reflection summary, not a clinical diagnosis.

About This Measure

A 12-item measure of two core dimensions of adult attachment in close relationships: Attachment Anxiety (concern about abandonment and partner availability) and Attachment Avoidance (discomfort with closeness and emotional dependence). Scores place you in a two-dimensional space whose quadrants correspond to the Secure, Anxious-Preoccupied, Dismissive-Avoidant, and Fearful-Avoidant prototypes.

Source & attribution: Clean-room IPIP-style scale (ImplicitifyAI) operationalising the Brennan, Clark & Shaver (1998) anxiety and avoidance dimensions. Taxonomy and quadrant labels following Wei, Russell, Mallinckrodt & Vogel (2007).