Sample report — illustrative responses, not a real result

The scores and narrative below are produced by the real ImplicitifyAI scoring engine from a fixed set of example responses. Nothing here is tied to a real person, and nothing is stored.

Assessment Report

IPIP-NEO-60 — Sample Profile

Completed on 10 June 2026 · 60 items answered

Your Scores

Each bar shows where your responses fall on the 5-point scale, expressed as a percentage of the possible range.

Neuroticism Lower 29% · mean 2.17 (12 items)

Neuroticism falls in the lower range (29%) — you endorsed these items less strongly than the scale midpoint.

Average (typical range) — 33rd percentile compared with the reference sample (N = 570). 90% confidence range: 12th–63rd percentile.

Anxiety Lower 25% · mean 2.00 (2 items)

Anxiety falls in the lower range (25%) — you endorsed these items less strongly than the scale midpoint.

Below average — 19th percentile compared with the reference sample (N = 600). 90% confidence range: 3rd–56th percentile.

Anger Lower 25% · mean 2.00 (2 items)

Anger falls in the lower range (25%) — you endorsed these items less strongly than the scale midpoint.

Average (typical range) — 38th percentile compared with the reference sample (N = 795). 90% confidence range: 11th–72nd percentile.

Depression Lower 0% · mean 1.00 (2 items)

Depression falls in the lower range (0%) — you endorsed these items less strongly than the scale midpoint.

Well below average — 15th percentile compared with the reference sample (N = 673). 90% confidence range: 3rd–44th percentile.

Self-Consciousness Average 50% · mean 3.00 (2 items)

Self-Consciousness falls in the average range (50%) — your answers sit near the middle of the scale, a balanced or mixed pattern.

Average (typical range) — 69th percentile compared with the reference sample (N = 795). 90% confidence range: 26th–95th percentile.

Immoderation Average 50% · mean 3.00 (2 items)

Immoderation falls in the average range (50%) — your answers sit near the middle of the scale, a balanced or mixed pattern.

Average (typical range) — 68th percentile compared with the reference sample (N = 673). 90% confidence range: 28th–93rd percentile.

Vulnerability Lower 25% · mean 2.00 (2 items)

Vulnerability falls in the lower range (25%) — you endorsed these items less strongly than the scale midpoint.

Average (typical range) — 35th percentile compared with the reference sample (N = 626). 90% confidence range: 9th–70th percentile.

Extraversion Higher 79% · mean 4.17 (12 items)

Extraversion falls in the higher range (79%) — you endorsed these items more strongly than the scale midpoint.

Well above average — 88th percentile compared with the reference sample (N = 795). 90% confidence range: 64th–98th percentile.

Friendliness Higher 75% · mean 4.00 (2 items)

Friendliness falls in the higher range (75%) — you endorsed these items more strongly than the scale midpoint.

Average (typical range) — 60th percentile compared with the reference sample (N = 795). 90% confidence range: 22nd–90th percentile.

Gregariousness Higher 75% · mean 4.00 (2 items)

Gregariousness falls in the higher range (75%) — you endorsed these items more strongly than the scale midpoint.

Well above average — 87th percentile compared with the reference sample (N = 795). 90% confidence range: 53rd–99th percentile.

Assertiveness Higher 100% · mean 5.00 (2 items)

Assertiveness falls in the higher range (100%) — you endorsed these items more strongly than the scale midpoint.

Well above average — 96th percentile compared with the reference sample (N = 795). 90% confidence range: 80th–99th percentile.

Activity Level Higher 75% · mean 4.00 (2 items)

Activity Level falls in the higher range (75%) — you endorsed these items more strongly than the scale midpoint.

Average (typical range) — 68th percentile compared with the reference sample (N = 795). 90% confidence range: 34th–91st percentile.

Excitement-Seeking Average 50% · mean 3.00 (2 items)

Excitement-Seeking falls in the average range (50%) — your answers sit near the middle of the scale, a balanced or mixed pattern.

Below average — 27th percentile compared with the reference sample (N = 795). 90% confidence range: 5th–68th percentile.

Cheerfulness Higher 100% · mean 5.00 (2 items)

Cheerfulness falls in the higher range (100%) — you endorsed these items more strongly than the scale midpoint.

Well above average — 90th percentile compared with the reference sample (N = 795). 90% confidence range: 59th–99th percentile.

Openness to Experience Higher 79% · mean 4.17 (12 items)

Openness to Experience falls in the higher range (79%) — you endorsed these items more strongly than the scale midpoint.

Well above average — 89th percentile compared with the reference sample (N = 600). 90% confidence range: 66th–98th percentile.

Imagination Higher 75% · mean 4.00 (2 items)

Imagination falls in the higher range (75%) — you endorsed these items more strongly than the scale midpoint.

Artistic Interests Higher 100% · mean 5.00 (2 items)

Artistic Interests falls in the higher range (100%) — you endorsed these items more strongly than the scale midpoint.

Well above average — 84th percentile compared with the reference sample (N = 673). 90% confidence range: 61st–95th percentile.

Emotionality Higher 75% · mean 4.00 (2 items)

Emotionality falls in the higher range (75%) — you endorsed these items more strongly than the scale midpoint.

Above average — 76th percentile compared with the reference sample (N = 673). 90% confidence range: 41st–95th percentile.

Adventurousness Average 50% · mean 3.00 (2 items)

Adventurousness falls in the average range (50%) — your answers sit near the middle of the scale, a balanced or mixed pattern.

Average (typical range) — 55th percentile compared with the reference sample (N = 600). 90% confidence range: 16th–90th percentile.

Intellect Higher 100% · mean 5.00 (2 items)

Intellect falls in the higher range (100%) — you endorsed these items more strongly than the scale midpoint.

Well above average — 91st percentile compared with the reference sample (N = 673). 90% confidence range: 71st–98th percentile.

Liberalism Higher 75% · mean 4.00 (2 items)

Liberalism falls in the higher range (75%) — you endorsed these items more strongly than the scale midpoint.

Above average — 74th percentile compared with the reference sample (N = 673). 90% confidence range: 36th–95th percentile.

Agreeableness Higher 83% · mean 4.33 (12 items)

Agreeableness falls in the higher range (83%) — you endorsed these items more strongly than the scale midpoint.

Above average — 78th percentile compared with the reference sample (N = 570). 90% confidence range: 44th–96th percentile.

Trust Higher 75% · mean 4.00 (2 items)

Trust falls in the higher range (75%) — you endorsed these items more strongly than the scale midpoint.

Average (typical range) — 62nd percentile compared with the reference sample (N = 795). 90% confidence range: 26th–89th percentile.

Morality Higher 100% · mean 5.00 (2 items)

Morality falls in the higher range (100%) — you endorsed these items more strongly than the scale midpoint.

Altruism Higher 100% · mean 5.00 (2 items)

Altruism falls in the higher range (100%) — you endorsed these items more strongly than the scale midpoint.

Cooperation Higher 75% · mean 4.00 (2 items)

Cooperation falls in the higher range (75%) — you endorsed these items more strongly than the scale midpoint.

Modesty Average 50% · mean 3.00 (2 items)

Modesty falls in the average range (50%) — your answers sit near the middle of the scale, a balanced or mixed pattern.

Sympathy Higher 100% · mean 5.00 (2 items)

Sympathy falls in the higher range (100%) — you endorsed these items more strongly than the scale midpoint.

Well above average — 92nd percentile compared with the reference sample (N = 626). 90% confidence range: 60th–99th percentile.

Conscientiousness Higher 79% · mean 4.17 (12 items)

Conscientiousness falls in the higher range (79%) — you endorsed these items more strongly than the scale midpoint.

Average (typical range) — 60th percentile compared with the reference sample (N = 647). 90% confidence range: 26th–87th percentile.

Self-Efficacy Higher 100% · mean 5.00 (2 items)

Self-Efficacy falls in the higher range (100%) — you endorsed these items more strongly than the scale midpoint.

Well above average — 94th percentile compared with the reference sample (N = 795). 90% confidence range: 66th–99th percentile.

Orderliness Higher 75% · mean 4.00 (2 items)

Orderliness falls in the higher range (75%) — you endorsed these items more strongly than the scale midpoint.

Average (typical range) — 63rd percentile compared with the reference sample (N = 795). 90% confidence range: 24th–92nd percentile.

Dutifulness Higher 100% · mean 5.00 (2 items)

Dutifulness falls in the higher range (100%) — you endorsed these items more strongly than the scale midpoint.

Achievement-Striving Higher 75% · mean 4.00 (2 items)

Achievement-Striving falls in the higher range (75%) — you endorsed these items more strongly than the scale midpoint.

Self-Discipline Higher 75% · mean 4.00 (2 items)

Self-Discipline falls in the higher range (75%) — you endorsed these items more strongly than the scale midpoint.

Cautiousness Average 50% · mean 3.00 (2 items)

Cautiousness falls in the average range (50%) — your answers sit near the middle of the scale, a balanced or mixed pattern.

Well below average — 9th percentile compared with the reference sample (N = 795). 90% confidence range: 1st–41st percentile.

What this means

Within this profile, your relative high point is Dutifulness (100%) and your relative low point is Depression (0%). These are standings within your own responses — a self-reflection summary, not a clinical diagnosis.

About This Measure

A 60-item public-domain IPIP measure of the five major domains of personality — Neuroticism, Extraversion, Openness to Experience, Agreeableness, and Conscientiousness — and the thirty narrower facets beneath them (two items each). Reports five broad domain scores together with a fine-grained facet profile.

Source & attribution: Maples-Keller, J. L., Williamson, R. L., Sleep, C. E., Carter, N. T., Campbell, W. K., & Miller, J. D. (2017). Using item response theory to develop a 60-item representation of the NEO-PI-R: The IPIP-NEO-60. Journal of Personality Assessment. Items drawn from the public-domain International Personality Item Pool (Goldberg et al., 2006; ipip.ori.org).