Assessment Report
IPIP-NEO-120 — Sample Profile
Your Scores
Each bar shows where your responses fall on the 5-point scale, expressed as a percentage of the possible range.
Big Five Domain Scores
Each domain is the mean of its six facet scores (scale 4–20).
Neuroticism falls in the lower range (25%) — you endorsed these items less strongly than the scale midpoint.
Well below average — 12th percentile compared with the reference sample (N = 320128). 90% confidence range: 5th–26th percentile.
Where you fall relative to the population — a normative comparison, not a diagnostic indicator.
Extraversion falls in the average range (58%) — your answers sit near the middle of the scale, a balanced or mixed pattern.
Average (typical range) — 44th percentile compared with the reference sample (N = 320128). 90% confidence range: 24th–65th percentile.
Where you fall relative to the population — a normative comparison, not a diagnostic indicator.
Openness to Experience falls in the higher range (83%) — you endorsed these items more strongly than the scale midpoint.
Well above average — 96th percentile compared with the reference sample (N = 320128). 90% confidence range: 86th–99th percentile.
Where you fall relative to the population — a normative comparison, not a diagnostic indicator.
Agreeableness falls in the higher range (79%) — you endorsed these items more strongly than the scale midpoint.
Above average — 81st percentile compared with the reference sample (N = 320128). 90% confidence range: 60th–94th percentile.
Where you fall relative to the population — a normative comparison, not a diagnostic indicator.
Conscientiousness falls in the higher range (71%) — you endorsed these items more strongly than the scale midpoint.
Average (typical range) — 57th percentile compared with the reference sample (N = 320128). 90% confidence range: 36th–75th percentile.
Where you fall relative to the population — a normative comparison, not a diagnostic indicator.
Facet Profile
Neuroticism falls in the lower range (25%) — you endorsed these items less strongly than the scale midpoint.
Well above average — 99th percentile compared with the reference sample (N = 320128). 90% confidence range: 99th–99th percentile.
Where you fall relative to the population — a normative comparison, not a diagnostic indicator.
Anxiety falls in the lower range (25%) — you endorsed these items less strongly than the scale midpoint.
Well below average — 14th percentile compared with the reference sample (N = 320128). 90% confidence range: 3rd–37th percentile.
Where you fall relative to the population — a normative comparison, not a diagnostic indicator.
Anger falls in the lower range (25%) — you endorsed these items less strongly than the scale midpoint.
Below average — 20th percentile compared with the reference sample (N = 320128). 90% confidence range: 7th–40th percentile.
Where you fall relative to the population — a normative comparison, not a diagnostic indicator.
Depression falls in the lower range (0%) — you endorsed these items less strongly than the scale midpoint.
Well below average — 8th percentile compared with the reference sample (N = 320128). 90% confidence range: 2nd–23rd percentile.
Where you fall relative to the population — a normative comparison, not a diagnostic indicator.
Self-Consciousness falls in the average range (50%) — your answers sit near the middle of the scale, a balanced or mixed pattern.
Average (typical range) — 53rd percentile compared with the reference sample (N = 320128). 90% confidence range: 22nd–83rd percentile.
Where you fall relative to the population — a normative comparison, not a diagnostic indicator.
Immoderation falls in the lower range (25%) — you endorsed these items less strongly than the scale midpoint.
Well below average — 13th percentile compared with the reference sample (N = 320128). 90% confidence range: 2nd–39th percentile.
Where you fall relative to the population — a normative comparison, not a diagnostic indicator.
Vulnerability falls in the lower range (25%) — you endorsed these items less strongly than the scale midpoint.
Below average — 28th percentile compared with the reference sample (N = 320128). 90% confidence range: 9th–58th percentile.
Where you fall relative to the population — a normative comparison, not a diagnostic indicator.
Extraversion falls in the average range (58%) — your answers sit near the middle of the scale, a balanced or mixed pattern.
Well above average — 99th percentile compared with the reference sample (N = 320128). 90% confidence range: 99th–99th percentile.
Where you fall relative to the population — a normative comparison, not a diagnostic indicator.
Friendliness falls in the higher range (75%) — you endorsed these items more strongly than the scale midpoint.
Average (typical range) — 66th percentile compared with the reference sample (N = 320128). 90% confidence range: 38th–87th percentile.
Where you fall relative to the population — a normative comparison, not a diagnostic indicator.
Gregariousness falls in the average range (50%) — your answers sit near the middle of the scale, a balanced or mixed pattern.
Average (typical range) — 46th percentile compared with the reference sample (N = 320128). 90% confidence range: 20th–74th percentile.
Where you fall relative to the population — a normative comparison, not a diagnostic indicator.
Assertiveness falls in the higher range (75%) — you endorsed these items more strongly than the scale midpoint.
Average (typical range) — 66th percentile compared with the reference sample (N = 320128). 90% confidence range: 42nd–85th percentile.
Where you fall relative to the population — a normative comparison, not a diagnostic indicator.
Activity Level falls in the average range (50%) — your answers sit near the middle of the scale, a balanced or mixed pattern.
Average (typical range) — 39th percentile compared with the reference sample (N = 320128). 90% confidence range: 12th–73rd percentile.
Where you fall relative to the population — a normative comparison, not a diagnostic indicator.
Excitement-Seeking falls in the lower range (25%) — you endorsed these items less strongly than the scale midpoint.
Well below average — 9th percentile compared with the reference sample (N = 320128). 90% confidence range: 1st–30th percentile.
Where you fall relative to the population — a normative comparison, not a diagnostic indicator.
Cheerfulness falls in the higher range (75%) — you endorsed these items more strongly than the scale midpoint.
Average (typical range) — 58th percentile compared with the reference sample (N = 320128). 90% confidence range: 30th–83rd percentile.
Where you fall relative to the population — a normative comparison, not a diagnostic indicator.
Openness to Experience falls in the higher range (83%) — you endorsed these items more strongly than the scale midpoint.
Well above average — 99th percentile compared with the reference sample (N = 320128). 90% confidence range: 99th–99th percentile.
Where you fall relative to the population — a normative comparison, not a diagnostic indicator.
Imagination falls in the higher range (100%) — you endorsed these items more strongly than the scale midpoint.
Well above average — 94th percentile compared with the reference sample (N = 320128). 90% confidence range: 78th–99th percentile.
Where you fall relative to the population — a normative comparison, not a diagnostic indicator.
Artistic Interests falls in the higher range (100%) — you endorsed these items more strongly than the scale midpoint.
Well above average — 93rd percentile compared with the reference sample (N = 320128). 90% confidence range: 75th–99th percentile.
Where you fall relative to the population — a normative comparison, not a diagnostic indicator.
Emotionality falls in the higher range (75%) — you endorsed these items more strongly than the scale midpoint.
Average (typical range) — 60th percentile compared with the reference sample (N = 320128). 90% confidence range: 24th–89th percentile.
Where you fall relative to the population — a normative comparison, not a diagnostic indicator.
Adventurousness falls in the average range (50%) — your answers sit near the middle of the scale, a balanced or mixed pattern.
Average (typical range) — 47th percentile compared with the reference sample (N = 320128). 90% confidence range: 17th–79th percentile.
Where you fall relative to the population — a normative comparison, not a diagnostic indicator.
Intellect falls in the higher range (100%) — you endorsed these items more strongly than the scale midpoint.
Well above average — 94th percentile compared with the reference sample (N = 320128). 90% confidence range: 76th–99th percentile.
Where you fall relative to the population — a normative comparison, not a diagnostic indicator.
Liberalism falls in the higher range (75%) — you endorsed these items more strongly than the scale midpoint.
Well above average — 91st percentile compared with the reference sample (N = 320128). 90% confidence range: 67th–99th percentile.
Where you fall relative to the population — a normative comparison, not a diagnostic indicator.
Agreeableness falls in the higher range (79%) — you endorsed these items more strongly than the scale midpoint.
Well above average — 99th percentile compared with the reference sample (N = 320128). 90% confidence range: 99th–99th percentile.
Where you fall relative to the population — a normative comparison, not a diagnostic indicator.
Trust falls in the higher range (75%) — you endorsed these items more strongly than the scale midpoint.
Above average — 77th percentile compared with the reference sample (N = 320128). 90% confidence range: 54th–91st percentile.
Where you fall relative to the population — a normative comparison, not a diagnostic indicator.
Morality falls in the higher range (100%) — you endorsed these items more strongly than the scale midpoint.
Well above average — 88th percentile compared with the reference sample (N = 320128). 90% confidence range: 63rd–98th percentile.
Where you fall relative to the population — a normative comparison, not a diagnostic indicator.
Altruism falls in the higher range (75%) — you endorsed these items more strongly than the scale midpoint.
Average (typical range) — 39th percentile compared with the reference sample (N = 320128). 90% confidence range: 13th–72nd percentile.
Where you fall relative to the population — a normative comparison, not a diagnostic indicator.
Cooperation falls in the higher range (75%) — you endorsed these items more strongly than the scale midpoint.
Average (typical range) — 60th percentile compared with the reference sample (N = 320128). 90% confidence range: 26th–88th percentile.
Where you fall relative to the population — a normative comparison, not a diagnostic indicator.
Modesty falls in the average range (50%) — your answers sit near the middle of the scale, a balanced or mixed pattern.
Average (typical range) — 46th percentile compared with the reference sample (N = 320128). 90% confidence range: 17th–78th percentile.
Where you fall relative to the population — a normative comparison, not a diagnostic indicator.
Sympathy falls in the higher range (100%) — you endorsed these items more strongly than the scale midpoint.
Well above average — 95th percentile compared with the reference sample (N = 320128). 90% confidence range: 77th–99th percentile.
Where you fall relative to the population — a normative comparison, not a diagnostic indicator.
Conscientiousness falls in the higher range (71%) — you endorsed these items more strongly than the scale midpoint.
Well above average — 99th percentile compared with the reference sample (N = 320128). 90% confidence range: 99th–99th percentile.
Where you fall relative to the population — a normative comparison, not a diagnostic indicator.
Self-Efficacy falls in the higher range (75%) — you endorsed these items more strongly than the scale midpoint.
Average (typical range) — 45th percentile compared with the reference sample (N = 320128). 90% confidence range: 18th–74th percentile.
Where you fall relative to the population — a normative comparison, not a diagnostic indicator.
Orderliness falls in the average range (50%) — your answers sit near the middle of the scale, a balanced or mixed pattern.
Average (typical range) — 39th percentile compared with the reference sample (N = 320128). 90% confidence range: 18th–64th percentile.
Where you fall relative to the population — a normative comparison, not a diagnostic indicator.
Dutifulness falls in the higher range (100%) — you endorsed these items more strongly than the scale midpoint.
Well above average — 92nd percentile compared with the reference sample (N = 320128). 90% confidence range: 69th–99th percentile.
Where you fall relative to the population — a normative comparison, not a diagnostic indicator.
Achievement-Striving falls in the higher range (75%) — you endorsed these items more strongly than the scale midpoint.
Average (typical range) — 49th percentile compared with the reference sample (N = 320128). 90% confidence range: 21st–77th percentile.
Where you fall relative to the population — a normative comparison, not a diagnostic indicator.
Self-Discipline falls in the higher range (75%) — you endorsed these items more strongly than the scale midpoint.
Above average — 73rd percentile compared with the reference sample (N = 320128). 90% confidence range: 40th–93rd percentile.
Where you fall relative to the population — a normative comparison, not a diagnostic indicator.
Cautiousness falls in the average range (50%) — your answers sit near the middle of the scale, a balanced or mixed pattern.
Average (typical range) — 34th percentile compared with the reference sample (N = 320128). 90% confidence range: 16th–56th percentile.
Where you fall relative to the population — a normative comparison, not a diagnostic indicator.
What this means
Within this profile, your relative high point is Dutifulness (100%) and your relative low point is Depression (0%). These are standings within your own responses — a self-reflection summary, not a clinical diagnosis.
About This Measure
A 120-item public-domain IPIP personality measure scoring 30 facets across the five broad domains of the Five-Factor Model (Neuroticism, Extraversion, Openness to Experience, Agreeableness, and Conscientiousness), each represented by four items scored on a 1–5 agreement scale.
Source & attribution: Johnson, J. A. (2014). Measuring thirty facets of the Five Factor Model with a 120-item public domain inventory. Journal of Research in Personality, 51, 78–89.