Self-report measure

Ego Function Assessment

A 36-item self-report adaptation of Bellak's twelve ego functions, organized into four factors — Reality Contact, Drive/Affect Regulation, Object Relations & ARISE, and Autonomous Efficacy. Higher scores indicate stronger, more adaptive ego functioning. Built entirely from public-domain IPIP items.

At a glance

Items
36
Response scale
5-point (Very Inaccurate … Very Accurate)
Est. time
~12 min
Subscales
4
Norms
Referenced (N = 570)
Access
Free, self-serve

Detailed write-up pending

A full, citation-backed scientific write-up for this scale — overview, clinical use, and psychometrics in the voice of a dissertation "Measures" section — has not yet been authored. To honor the platform's no-fabricated-sources rule, this page currently shows only the verified registry facts above (item count, structure, scoring, and any published norms). No validity coefficients, reliability figures, or citations are shown here that cannot be traced to a named source; the authored write-up will be added once its sources have been read and recorded in the plan-integrity file.

Subscales

Reality Contact 12 items

how clearly and accurately you read situations

Drive/Affect Regulation 9 items

how well you manage feelings and impulses

Object Relations & ARISE 6 items

how well you sustain relationships and bounce back

Autonomous Efficacy 9 items

how independently and effectively you function day to day

Example item

“Frequently get things mixed up in my head.”

Very InaccurateModerately InaccurateNeither Accurate nor InaccurateModerately AccurateVery Accurate

Illustrative only. During administration items are presented one screen-set at a time; response-key direction is never shown to respondents.

Scoring & interpretation

Item responses are summed within each scale (reverse-keyed items recoded first) and expressed as a population percentile against the cited reference sample, with a reliability-based confidence range where α is published.

Psychometrics & norms

ScaleMSDNαMetric
Autonomous Efficacy35.133.995700.66summed raw

Norms computed from the Eugene-Springfield Community Sample (ESCS) — Lewis R. Goldberg’s adult community panel from Eugene and Springfield, Oregon (Harvard Dataverse, doi:10.7910/DVN/UF52WY). This is a community sample and is NOT nationally representative. The mean, standard deviation, reference N and Cronbach’s α were computed directly from the raw IPIP item-level responses on THIS scale’s exact item set and reverse-keying (complete cases); reference N varies by scale and is shown with each scale below. The confidence range uses the standard error of measurement (SEM = SD·√(1−α)) from that computed α.

Source & citation

Items drawn from the public-domain International Personality Item Pool (Goldberg et al., 2006; ipip.ori.org), organized by Bellak's ego-function framework (Bellak, Hurvich, & Gediman, 1973; Bellak & Goldsmith, 1984).