Clinical instrument

Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)

A 9-item self-report screener for the severity of depressive symptoms over the past two weeks. Public-domain instrument intended for use under clinician supervision.

A nine-item checklist of how often depression symptoms bothered you over the past two weeks—a first-line screen, not a diagnosis.

This is a clinical instrument. It is not publicly self-administered; a clinician assigns it through a secure patient link.

You learn how severe your depressive symptoms have been over the past two weeks.

For anyone who has been feeling down and wants to measure how much it is weighing on them.

It comes from primary care research on brief screening for depression.

Example score on the scale rangeChart drawn with invented example scores; not a real result.Example dataLower rangeMiddle rangeHigher rangeDepression Severity
Sample result, example data. Illustrative chart with invented scores; it does not describe any real respondent.
Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) box

What this test is

Welcome. A 9-item self-report screener for the severity of depressive symptoms over the past two weeks. Public-domain instrument intended for use under clinician supervision.

A nine-item checklist of how often depression symptoms bothered you over the past two weeks—a first-line screen, not a diagnosis.

The measure

The Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) was developed by Kroenke and colleagues (2001). It has 9 items, each answered on a 4-point (Not at all … Nearly every day) scale.

Kroenke, K., Spitzer, R. L., & Williams, J. B. W. (2001). The PHQ-9: Validity of a brief depression severity measure. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 16(9), 606–613.

At a glance

Items
9
Response scale
4-point (Not at all … Nearly every day)
Est. time
~1 min
Access
Assigned only · no per-report charge
Time frame
Past 2 weeks

What it measures

Nine experiences make up the questionnaire: little interest or pleasure in doing things; feeling down, depressed or hopeless; trouble with sleep; feeling tired or having little energy; poor appetite or overeating; feeling bad about oneself; trouble concentrating; moving or speaking noticeably slowly or restlessly; and thoughts of being better off dead or of self-harm. Each is rated by how often it has occurred over the past two weeks, from not at all to nearly every day. Together the items describe the core of a depressive episode: low mood and lost interest, accompanied by changes in the body, in thinking and in self-regard.

Kroenke, Spitzer and Williams (2001) developed the questionnaire as the depression module of the Patient Health Questionnaire, a self-report version of an earlier clinician-administered primary care interview. Each item corresponds to one of the nine symptom criteria for a major depressive episode in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM), which allows the same brief form to serve both as a screen and as a measure of severity.

The nine ratings are summed into a single total. Lower totals indicate that depressive symptoms have been occasional or absent over the past two weeks; higher totals indicate symptoms that have been frequent and, at the upper end of the range, present on most days. The report places the total within the published severity bands and describes what that range tends to mean. A high score is a reason for a fuller conversation with a qualified clinician, and any endorsement of the final item, about thoughts of death or self-harm, deserves prompt attention whatever the total.

The questionnaire is used to screen for depression in medical and mental health settings, to monitor change during treatment, and as an outcome measure in research. On this site it pairs naturally with the GAD-7 for anxiety symptoms, the WHO-5 Well-Being Index, which approaches mood from the side of positive well-being, the Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) for the period around childbirth, and the Depression Anxiety Stress Scales (DASS-21).

Nomological network

Convergently/construct-wise, as PHQ-9 severity increased, functional status declined on all six SF-20 subscales, with the strongest association to SF-20 mental health (r = .73) and progressively smaller associations to general health (.55), social functioning (.52), role functioning (.43), physical functioning (.37), and bodily pain (.33); symptom-related difficulty, sick days, and health-care utilization also rose with severity (Kroenke et al., 2001). Discriminantly, associations with physical-function and pain scales were weaker than with mental-health functioning, consistent with a depression-severity rather than general-medical-complaint instrument. A positive screen indicates need for clinical follow-up, not a diagnosis by itself.

Validity evidence

At the published cutoff sensitivity and specificity for major depression are both about 0.88 (Kroenke et al., 2001).

Example item

“Little interest or pleasure in doing things”

Not at allSeveral daysMore than half the daysNearly every day

Illustrative only. During administration items are presented one screen-set at a time; response-key direction is never shown to respondents.

Scoring & interpretation

Item responses are summed to a total score and compared against published screening cutoffs.

The report explains which published screening bands your score falls in and what they mean.

Related measures

Common questions

What cutoff is commonly used?

Is a high score a diagnosis?

No. Severity bands guide follow-up; they are not a diagnosis.

Is it self-serve here?

No. Current policy keeps PHQ-9 clinician-assigned.

References

  1. Kroenke, K., Spitzer, R. L., & Williams, J. B. W. (2001). The PHQ-9: Validity of a brief depression severity measure. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 16(9), 606–613.
  2. Kroenke, K., & Spitzer, R. L. (2002). The PHQ-9: a new depression diagnostic and severity measure. Psychiatric Annals, 32(9), 509-515.

Sample report preview

The report shows your total score and where it falls across the range of possible scores, followed by a plain-language explanation of what scores in that region describe. Where the instrument has published interpretive bands, the report names the band and what it means. It closes with notes on how to read the result and on when a conversation with a qualified professional may be useful.

Report contents
SectionWhat it shows
ScoreYour scale score, computed with the published scoring key.
Score bandsWhere your score falls among the published bands listed on this page.
ComparisonsHow your scores compare with a published comparison group.

How would you like to use it?

For researchers

Sign up as an Implicitify researcher to use the full suite of measures in your studies, or pay for each test you give. Research pricing is still being set, so we will confirm it with you when you get in touch.

Become a researcher

For clinicians

Open a clinician account to send this measure to your clients or patients through a secure link and review their scored results in one place.

Create a clinician accountAlready have an account? Go to your clinician dashboard.

For educators

Use our measures in your courses to show students how psychological assessment works and to teach the principles of testing.

Request course access
Ask Qualia