Clinical instrument

Revised Physical Anhedonia Scale (RPAS)

A 61-item true/false self-report measure of physical anhedonia, a reduced capacity to experience pleasure from physical and sensory sources. Administered only via a clinician patient link.

This is a clinical instrument. It is not publicly self-administered; a clinician assigns it through a secure patient link.

You learn how much pleasure you take in physical experiences.

For anyone who finds that physical pleasures like food, touch or music feel muted.

It comes from research on reduced pleasure from the senses as a lasting trait.

Example score on the scale rangeChart drawn with invented example scores; not a real result.Example dataLower rangeMiddle rangeHigher rangePhysical Anhedonia
Sample result, example data. Illustrative chart with invented scores; it does not describe any real respondent.
Revised Physical Anhedonia Scale (RPAS) box

What this test is

Welcome. A 61-item true/false self-report measure of physical anhedonia, a reduced capacity to experience pleasure from physical and sensory sources. Administered only via a clinician patient link.

The measure

The Revised Physical Anhedonia Scale (RPAS) was developed by Chapman and colleagues (1976). It has 61 items, each answered on a False / True scale.

Chapman, L. J., Chapman, J. P., & Raulin, M. L. (1976). Scales for physical and social anhedonia. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 85, 374-382.

At a glance

Items
61
Response scale
False / True
Est. time
~9 min
Access
Assigned only · no per-report charge

What it measures

Sixty-one true-or-false statements describe enjoyment, or its absence, in physical and sensory experience: the taste of food, the feeling of the sun or a cool breeze, the beauty of a sunset, music, dancing, physical affection and sex. A person with physical anhedonia might find that foods all taste much the same, that a warm bath gives little pleasure, or that physical closeness is more neutral than pleasant.

Chapman, Chapman and Raulin (1976) developed the scales for physical and social anhedonia following Meehl (1962), who regarded a reduced capacity for pleasure as a core feature of vulnerability to schizophrenia. Physical anhedonia has since been studied in relation to schizophrenia spectrum conditions and to depression, where loss of pleasure is also central.

Statements answered in the anhedonic direction are counted. Higher totals describe a more pervasive reduction in sensory and physical enjoyment; lower totals describe ordinary enjoyment of the senses. Because the scale describes a stable disposition, it differs from the temporary loss of pleasure during a depressive episode, although the two can occur together.

The scale is used in research on schizotypy, depression and reward processing, and in clinical assessment by professionals. On this site, the Revised Social Anhedonia Scale describes reduced pleasure in social contact, the PHQ-9 asks about recent loss of interest, and the Isolation, Withdrawal, and Detachment Scale includes an anhedonia scale.

Norms and administration

The scale is clinician-administered on this platform and its elevation is a research indicator, not a clinical determination.

Nomological network

The Physical Anhedonia Scale measures a reduced ability to feel pleasure from physical and sensory experiences, and it loads on the negative schizotypy factor of the Wisconsin Schizotypy Scales (Chapman et al., 1976; Kwapil et al., 2008).

Negative schizotypy is separate from the positive schizotypy measured by perceptual aberration and magical ideation, and it relates to social withdrawal and flat affect rather than to unusual beliefs (Kwapil et al., 2008). Physical anhedonia is related to, but distinct from, social anhedonia, which predicted later schizophrenia-spectrum disorders in a longitudinal study (Kwapil, 1998).

Example item

“I have usually found lovemaking to be intensely pleasurable.”

FalseTrue

Illustrative only. During administration items are presented one screen-set at a time; response-key direction is never shown to respondents.

Scoring & interpretation

Item responses are summed within each scale (reverse-keyed items recoded first) and expressed as a percent of the maximum possible score. No normative percentile is applied — there is no verbatim-matched published norm for this exact item set.

References

  1. Chapman, L. J., Chapman, J. P., & Raulin, M. L. (1976). Scales for physical and social anhedonia. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 85, 374–382.
  2. Kwapil, T. R., Barrantes-Vidal, N., & Silvia, P. J. (2008). The dimensional structure of the Wisconsin Schizotypy Scales: Factor identification and construct validity. Schizophrenia Bulletin, 34(3), 444–457.
  3. Kwapil, T. R. (1998). Social anhedonia as a predictor of the development of schizophrenia-spectrum disorders. Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 107(4), 558–565.

Sample report preview

The report shows your total score and where it falls across the range of possible scores, followed by a plain-language explanation of what scores in that region describe. Where the instrument has published interpretive bands, the report names the band and what it means. It closes with notes on how to read the result and on when a conversation with a qualified professional may be useful.

Report contents
SectionWhat it shows
ScoreYour scale score, computed with the published scoring key.

How would you like to use it?

For researchers

Sign up as an Implicitify researcher to use the full suite of measures in your studies, or pay for each test you give. Research pricing is still being set, so we will confirm it with you when you get in touch.

Become a researcher

For clinicians

Open a clinician account to send this measure to your clients or patients through a secure link and review their scored results in one place.

Create a clinician accountAlready have an account? Go to your clinician dashboard.

For educators

Use our measures in your courses to show students how psychological assessment works and to teach the principles of testing.

Request course access
Ask Qualia