Self-report measure

Interpersonal Reactivity Index Battery

The Interpersonal Reactivity Index Battery administers Davis’s four-subscale empathy instrument as one 28-item session: Perspective-Taking, Empathic Concern, Personal Distress, and Fantasy. Each subscale is scored separately on a 7–35 raw range (1–5 anchors). There is no total IRI score — Davis designed the IRI as a multidimensional profile, not a single empathy sum. College-student norms use the published Davis (1983) figures with the +7 mean shift for 1–5 coding.

At a glance

Items
28
Response scale
5-point (Does Not Describe Me Well … Describes Me Very Well)
Est. time
~4 min
Subscales
4
Norms
Referenced (N = 1161)
Access
Free to take · unlock scores & PDF $15

Detailed write-up pending

A full, citation-backed scientific write-up for this scale — overview, clinical use, and psychometrics in the voice of a dissertation "Measures" section — has not yet been authored. To honor the platform's no-fabricated-sources rule, this page currently shows only the verified registry facts above (item count, structure, scoring, and any published norms). No validity coefficients, reliability figures, or citations are shown here that cannot be traced to a named source; the authored write-up will be added once its sources have been read and recorded in the plan-integrity file.

Subscales

Perspective-Taking 7 items

how readily you adopt the psychological viewpoint of others in daily life

Empathic Concern 7 items

how strongly you feel other-oriented sympathy and concern for people in difficulty

Personal Distress 7 items

how much you experience self-focused anxiety and distress when witnessing others in need

Fantasy 7 items

how readily you imaginatively enter the emotional world of fictional characters and scenarios

Example item

“I sometimes find it difficult to see things from the "other guy's" point of view.”

Does Not Describe Me WellSlightly Describes MeSomewhat Describes MeMostly Describes MeDescribes Me Very Well

Illustrative only. During administration items are presented one screen-set at a time; response-key direction is never shown to respondents.

Scoring & interpretation

Item responses are summed within each scale (reverse-keyed items recoded first) and expressed as a population percentile against the cited reference sample, with a reliability-based confidence range where α is published.

Psychometrics & norms

ScaleMSDNαMetric
Perspective-Taking24.374.8211610.71summed raw
Empathic Concern27.364.2311610.68summed raw
Personal Distress17.874.9911610.75summed raw
Fantasy24.245.5911610.78summed raw

Davis, M. H. (1983). Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44(1), 113–126 — U.S. college student validation sample (N = 1,161; 579 male, 582 female), verbatim 7-item Perspective-Taking subscale. Published sex-stratified figures: males M = 16.78, SD = 4.72; females M = 17.96, SD = 4.85 (0–4 response coding, sum 0–28). This site administers the identical items and anchors coded 1–5 (sum 7–35), so the reference mean is shifted by exactly +7; an additive shift leaves the SD unchanged. The combined reference values are pooled exactly from the published sex-stratified figures (M = 24.37, SD = 4.82 on the 7–35 metric). The confidence range uses the standard error of measurement (SEM = SD·√(1−α)) from the published per-subscale standardized Cronbach’s α (Davis, 1980; males .71, females .75 — the lower bound is used for the widest, most conservative range).

Source & citation

Davis, M. H. (1983). Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44(1), 113–126. Items hosted at ipip.ori.org.