Cognitive Failures
Cognitive Failures uses 10 International Personality Item Pool statements to assess Cognitive Failures. Respondents complete 10 items using 1–5 ratings. Keyed responses are summed for the reported scale score.
At a glance
What it measures
Cognitive Failures is administered here as one of the International Personality Item Pool's single-construct scales: original public-domain items catalogued at ipip.ori.org (Goldberg, 1999) and keyed to one specific individual-differences construct, rather than belonging to a broad multi-factor inventory. This form presents 10 items rated on a 5-point scale; responses are summed in the keyed direction after any reverse-worded items are recoded.
The IPIP catalog lists this item set against an established source inventory — Broadbent et al., 1982. The IPIP statements are original public-domain items keyed to the same construct: scores here are not scores on that source instrument, and findings published for the source instrument should not be transferred to this form without independent evidence.
Psychometric properties
The notes below are reproduced from the platform's psychometrics register for this instrument — the same source-cited reliability, validity, and norms text that accompanies its downloadable report.
IPIP-based operationalization of Broadbent et al.'s (1982) Cognitive Failures Questionnaire constructs; subscale reliability estimates are not available from a single published validation study for this exact public-domain item set.
Items assess self-reported failures of perception, memory, and motor functioning in everyday life, constructs with established convergent validity with attention measures, accident proneness, and stress outcomes (Broadbent et al., 1982).
Scores are expressed as percent-of-maximum on the 1–5 accuracy scale using Higher/Average/Lower bands. No published normative tables exist for this specific public-domain operationalization.
Example item
“Get confused easily.”
Illustrative only. During administration items are presented one screen-set at a time; response-key direction is never shown to respondents.
Scoring & interpretation
Item responses are summed within each scale (reverse-keyed items recoded first) and expressed as a population percentile against the cited reference sample, with a reliability-based confidence range where α is published.
Psychometrics & norms
| Scale | M | SD | N | α | Metric |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cognitive Failures | 23.12 | 6.15 | 531 | 0.79 | summed raw |
Norms computed from the Eugene-Springfield Community Sample (ESCS) — Lewis R. Goldberg’s adult community panel from Eugene and Springfield, Oregon (Harvard Dataverse, doi:10.7910/DVN/UF52WY). This is a community sample and is NOT nationally representative. The mean, standard deviation, reference N and Cronbach’s α were computed directly from the raw IPIP item-level responses on THIS scale’s exact item set and reverse-keying (complete cases); reference N varies by scale and is shown with each scale below. The confidence range uses the standard error of measurement (SEM = SD·√(1−α)) from that computed α.
Source & citation
International Personality Item Pool (ipip.ori.org). Source scale: Broadbent et al., 1982.
References
- Broadbent, D. E., Cooper, P. F., FitzGerald, P., & Parkes, K. R. (1982). The Cognitive Failures Questionnaire (CFQ) and its correlates. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 21(1), 1-16.
- Goldberg, L. R. (1999). A broad-bandwidth, public domain, personality inventory measuring the lower-level facets of several five-factor models. Personality Psychology in Europe, 7, 7-28.