Self-report measure

Impression-Management

Impression-Management uses 20 International Personality Item Pool statements to assess Impression-Management. Respondents complete 20 items using 1–5 ratings. Keyed responses are summed for the reported scale score.

At a glance

Items
20
Response scale
5-point (Very Inaccurate … Very Accurate)
Est. time
~3 min
Norms
Percent-of-maximum
Access
Free, self-serve

What it measures

Impression-Management is administered here as one of the International Personality Item Pool's single-construct scales: original public-domain items catalogued at ipip.ori.org (Goldberg, 1999) and keyed to one specific individual-differences construct, rather than belonging to a broad multi-factor inventory. This form presents 20 items rated on a 5-point scale; responses are summed in the keyed direction after any reverse-worded items are recoded.

The construct label and item membership follow the IPIP catalog directly. Because this exact public-domain item set is what is administered, the standings shown in the norms section are computed on this form itself (see the cited reference-sample note), not borrowed from any other instrument.

Psychometric properties

The notes below are reproduced from the platform's psychometrics register for this instrument — the same source-cited reliability, validity, and norms text that accompanies its downloadable report.

Paulhus (1984) reports high internal consistency (alpha ≈ .83) for the impression management component of the Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding. IPIP-based operationalization; reliability of this exact item set is not separately published.

Impression management — deliberate self-presentation to appear more favorable — shows good discriminant validity from self-deception and predicts observer ratings of sycophancy and response bias (Paulhus, 1984, 1991).

Scores are expressed as percent-of-maximum on the 1–5 accuracy scale using Higher/Average/Lower bands. No published normative tables exist for this specific IPIP operationalization.

Example item

“Would never take things that aren't mine.”

Very InaccurateModerately InaccurateNeither Accurate nor InaccurateModerately AccurateVery Accurate

Illustrative only. During administration items are presented one screen-set at a time; response-key direction is never shown to respondents.

Scoring & interpretation

Item responses are summed within each scale (reverse-keyed items recoded first) and expressed as a percent of the maximum possible score. No normative percentile is applied — there is no verbatim-matched published norm for this exact item set.

Source & citation

International Personality Item Pool (ipip.ori.org).

References

  1. Paulhus, D. L. (1984). Two-component models of socially desirable responding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46(3), 598-609.
  2. Goldberg, L. R. (1999). A broad-bandwidth, public domain, personality inventory. Personality Psychology in Europe, 7, 7-28.