Impression-Management
Impression-Management uses 20 International Personality Item Pool statements to assess Impression-Management. Respondents complete 20 items using 1–5 ratings. Keyed responses are summed for the reported scale score.
At a glance
What it measures
Impression-Management is administered here as one of the International Personality Item Pool's single-construct scales: original public-domain items catalogued at ipip.ori.org (Goldberg, 1999) and keyed to one specific individual-differences construct, rather than belonging to a broad multi-factor inventory. This form presents 20 items rated on a 5-point scale; responses are summed in the keyed direction after any reverse-worded items are recoded.
The construct label and item membership follow the IPIP catalog directly. Because this exact public-domain item set is what is administered, the standings shown in the norms section are computed on this form itself (see the cited reference-sample note), not borrowed from any other instrument.
Psychometric properties
The notes below are reproduced from the platform's psychometrics register for this instrument — the same source-cited reliability, validity, and norms text that accompanies its downloadable report.
Paulhus (1984) reports high internal consistency (alpha ≈ .83) for the impression management component of the Balanced Inventory of Desirable Responding. IPIP-based operationalization; reliability of this exact item set is not separately published.
Impression management — deliberate self-presentation to appear more favorable — shows good discriminant validity from self-deception and predicts observer ratings of sycophancy and response bias (Paulhus, 1984, 1991).
Scores are expressed as percent-of-maximum on the 1–5 accuracy scale using Higher/Average/Lower bands. No published normative tables exist for this specific IPIP operationalization.
Example item
“Would never take things that aren't mine.”
Illustrative only. During administration items are presented one screen-set at a time; response-key direction is never shown to respondents.
Scoring & interpretation
Item responses are summed within each scale (reverse-keyed items recoded first) and expressed as a percent of the maximum possible score. No normative percentile is applied — there is no verbatim-matched published norm for this exact item set.
Source & citation
International Personality Item Pool (ipip.ori.org).
References
- Paulhus, D. L. (1984). Two-component models of socially desirable responding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46(3), 598-609.
- Goldberg, L. R. (1999). A broad-bandwidth, public domain, personality inventory. Personality Psychology in Europe, 7, 7-28.