Locus of Control: Chance
Locus of Control: Chance uses 10 International Personality Item Pool statements to assess Locus of Control: Chance. Respondents complete 10 items using 1–5 ratings. Keyed responses are summed for the reported scale score.
At a glance
What it measures
Locus of Control: Chance is administered here as one of the International Personality Item Pool's single-construct scales: original public-domain items catalogued at ipip.ori.org (Goldberg, 1999) and keyed to one specific individual-differences construct, rather than belonging to a broad multi-factor inventory. This form presents 10 items rated on a 5-point scale; responses are summed in the keyed direction after any reverse-worded items are recoded.
The construct label and item membership follow the IPIP catalog directly. Because this exact public-domain item set is what is administered, the standings shown in the norms section are computed on this form itself (see the cited reference-sample note), not borrowed from any other instrument.
Psychometric properties
The notes below are reproduced from the platform's psychometrics register for this instrument — the same source-cited reliability, validity, and norms text that accompanies its downloadable report.
IPIP-based chance locus of control scale; reliability estimates for this exact 10-item public-domain operationalization are not available from a single published validation study.
Chance external locus — belief that outcomes are determined by luck or fate — is associated with fatalism, reduced health behaviors, and lower motivation for goal-directed effort (Levenson, 1974).
Scores are expressed as percent-of-maximum on the 1–5 accuracy scale using Higher/Average/Lower bands. No published normative tables exist for this specific IPIP operationalization.
Example item
“Believe that unfortunate events occur because of bad luck.”
Illustrative only. During administration items are presented one screen-set at a time; response-key direction is never shown to respondents.
Scoring & interpretation
Item responses are summed within each scale (reverse-keyed items recoded first) and expressed as a percent of the maximum possible score. No normative percentile is applied — there is no verbatim-matched published norm for this exact item set.
Source & citation
International Personality Item Pool (ipip.ori.org).
References
- Levenson, H. (1974). Activism and powerful others: Distinctions within the concept of internal-external control. Journal of Personality Assessment, 38(4), 377-383.
- Goldberg, L. R. (1999). A broad-bandwidth, public domain, personality inventory. Personality Psychology in Europe, 7, 7-28.