Clinical instrument

Dissociation: Full Scale

Dissociation: Full Scale uses 31 International Personality Item Pool statements to assess Dissociation: Full Scale.

This is a clinical instrument. It is not publicly self-administered; a clinician assigns it through a secure patient link.

You learn your overall level of dissociative experience across several kinds.

For anyone who wants a complete picture of how often they drift, blank out or feel unreal.

It comes from dissociation research that combines absorption, memory gaps and unreality into one profile.

Example score on the scale rangeChart drawn with invented example scores; not a real result.Example dataLower rangeMiddle rangeHigher rangeDissociation: Full Scale
Sample result, example data. Illustrative chart with invented scores; it does not describe any real respondent.

What this test is

Welcome. Dissociation: Full Scale uses 31 International Personality Item Pool statements to assess Dissociation: Full Scale.

The measure

It has 31 items, each answered on a 5-point (Very Inaccurate … Very Accurate) scale.

International Personality Item Pool (ipip.ori.org).

At a glance

Items
31
Response scale
5-point (Very Inaccurate … Very Accurate)
Est. time
~4 min
Access
Assigned only · no per-report charge

What it measures

Thirty-one statements describe the range of dissociative experience, from the ordinary to the unusual. Some describe absorption, becoming so immersed in an activity that one loses track of the surroundings; some describe amnesia, gaps in memory for one's own actions; and some describe depersonalization, feeling detached from oneself or one's surroundings.

Bernstein and Putnam (1986) described dissociation as a continuum running from common absorption to the experiences characteristic of dissociative disorders, and their Dissociative Experiences Scale became the standard measure. The statements here come from the public-domain International Personality Item Pool (IPIP) and cover the same three broad kinds of experience.

The ratings are combined into a single score. Lower scores describe experiences that are infrequent and mostly of the absorptive kind; higher scores describe more frequent dissociation, especially if amnesia and depersonalization contribute. A high score suggests that a careful assessment may be useful and is not a diagnosis.

The scale is used in research on dissociation and trauma. On this site, the three components can be taken separately as Absorption, Amnesia and Depersonalization, the Dissociation: Short Version is a briefer form, and the Dissociative Experiences Scale (DES-II) is the standard clinical measure.

Validity evidence

The three dissociation domains measured (absorption, depersonalization, amnesia) align with the DES dissociation construct, which shows good convergent validity with trauma history, PTSD severity, and clinical dissociative diagnoses.

Example item

“Drove or rode somewhere without remembering later what happened during all or part of the trip.”

Very InaccurateModerately InaccurateNeither Accurate nor InaccurateModerately AccurateVery Accurate

Illustrative only. During administration items are presented one screen-set at a time; response-key direction is never shown to respondents.

Scoring & interpretation

Item responses are summed within each scale (reverse-keyed items recoded first) and expressed as a percent of the maximum possible score. No normative percentile is applied — there is no verbatim-matched published norm for this exact item set.

References

  1. Bernstein, E. M., & Putnam, F. W. (1986). Development, reliability, and validity of a dissociation scale. Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, 174(12), 727-735.
  2. Goldberg, L. R. (1999). A broad-bandwidth, public domain, personality inventory measuring the lower-level facets of several five-factor models. Personality Psychology in Europe, 7, 7-28.

Sample report preview

The report shows your total score and where it falls across the range of possible scores, followed by a plain-language explanation of what scores in that region describe. Where the instrument has published interpretive bands, the report names the band and what it means. It closes with notes on how to read the result and on when a conversation with a qualified professional may be useful.

Report contents
SectionWhat it shows
ScoreYour scale score, computed with the published scoring key.

How would you like to use it?

For researchers

Sign up as an Implicitify researcher to use the full suite of measures in your studies, or pay for each test you give. Research pricing is still being set, so we will confirm it with you when you get in touch.

Become a researcher

For clinicians

Open a clinician account to send this measure to your clients or patients through a secure link and review their scored results in one place.

Create a clinician accountAlready have an account? Go to your clinician dashboard.

For educators

Use our measures in your courses to show students how psychological assessment works and to teach the principles of testing.

Request course access
Ask Qualia