Narrow-Trait Composites
Narrow Traits uses 247 International Personality Item Pool statements to assess 45 named scales.
You learn your scores on specific traits that a broad profile would leave out.
For anyone who wants detail on specific traits that broad profiles tend to blur.
Report and PDF $6, paid after you finish.
Your answers stay private.
It comes from personality research showing that narrow traits often predict behavior better than broad ones.
What this test is
Welcome. Narrow Traits uses 247 International Personality Item Pool statements to assess 45 named scales.
The measure
It has 247 items, each answered on a 5-point (Very Inaccurate … Very Accurate) scale. Its scores cover 45 separate scales.
Public-domain items from the International Personality Item Pool (Goldberg, L. R., 1999; ipip.ori.org). Scale membership and reverse-keying taken verbatim from Goldberg's IPIP multi-scale map (ScalesFor967items). Construct names from ipip.ori.org.
At a glance
What it measures
Forty-five small groups of statements describe specific, concrete tendencies: liking parties, liking crowds, being entertaining, enjoying reading, having a good memory, having mathematical or scientific ability, being even-tempered, being trusting, avoiding trouble, having good impulse control, and many more. Each group is narrow by design, describing one recognizable habit or preference rather than a broad dimension.
Hogan and Hogan (1992) organized their personality inventory around small groups of closely related items, called homogeneous item composites, which combine into broader scales. Goldberg (1999) wrote parallel composites for the public-domain International Personality Item Pool (IPIP), so that the same narrow tendencies can be measured freely.
Each composite is scored separately. Higher scores describe a stronger presence of the named tendency; lower scores describe its absence. Because each composite has only a few statements, individual scores are best read as indications, and patterns across related composites are more informative than any one score.
The composites are used in research and in detailed personal and occupational assessment. On this site, the Work-Relevant Personality Scales and Workplace Personality Profile combine narrow tendencies into broader work-related scales, and the Folk-Concept Trait Scales describe everyday traits at a middle level of breadth.
Origins and lineage
The HIC is the HPI's structural signature. Instead of writing one long scale per construct, Hogan composed each broad dimension from several homogeneous item composites — a handful of items each, all restating one narrow theme — so a profile can be read at two levels of resolution: the broad dimension, and the specific habits underneath it (Hogan & Hogan, 1992).
This collection is the IPIP's catalogue of those building blocks.
The International Personality Item Pool (IPIP) version used here
The scales here are original public-domain IPIP items keyed to constructs similar to the HPI's HICs; scores here are not scores on the Hogan Personality Inventory or its internal composites, and HPI-based interpretation does not transfer to this form. Scale membership and reverse-keying follow Goldberg's IPIP multi-scale map (ScalesFor967items) verbatim, with construct names as catalogued at ipip.ori.org.
Nomological network
These composites measure narrow traits, such as calmness, mastery, empathy and thrill seeking, built from the International Personality Item Pool (Goldberg et al., 2006). Narrow traits like these predict specific behaviors better than the broad five factors alone (Paunonen & Ashton, 2001).
Each narrow trait relates mainly to one or two broad factors while keeping specific variance of its own, which gives it discriminant value beyond the broad factors (Paunonen & Ashton, 2001).
Subscales
No Hostility 6 items
Competetive 6 items
Easy to Live With 6 items
Sensitive 6 items
Thrill-seeking 7 items
No Somatic Complaints 6 items
No Social Anxiety 6 items
Moralistic 5 items
Calmness 6 items
Identity 4 items
Intellectual Games 7 items
Self Confidence 6 items
Crowds/Not Spont (-) 1 items
Generates Ideas 6 items
Likes People 6 items
Mastery 6 items
Empathy 6 items
Not Anxious 6 items
Caring 6 items
No Depression 6 items
Virtuous 6 items
Impression Management 6 items
Education 7 items
Entertaining 5 items
Likes Parties 5 items
Reading 4 items
Appearance 4 items
Trusting 6 items
Culture 6 items
Curiosity 6 items
Leadership 6 items
Math Ability 4 items
Likes Crowds 5 items
Exhibitionistic 6 items
Science Ability 6 items
No Guilt 6 items
Experience Seeking 6 items
Not Spontaneous 5 items
Impulse Control 6 items
Good Attachment 5 items
Not Autonomous 5 items
Self Focus 6 items
Avoids Trouble 4 items
Even-tempered 6 items
Good Memory 2 items
Example item
“Accept apologies easily.”
Illustrative only. During administration items are presented one screen-set at a time; response-key direction is never shown to respondents.
Scoring & interpretation
Your report explains each of your scale scores in plain language.
References
- Hogan, R., & Hogan, J. (1992). Hogan Personality Inventory manual. Hogan Assessment Systems.
- Goldberg, L. R., Johnson, J. A., Eber, H. W., Hogan, R., Ashton, M. C., Cloninger, C. R., & Gough, H. G. (2006). The International Personality Item Pool and the future of public-domain personality measures. Journal of Research in Personality, 40(1), 84–96.
- Goldberg, L. R. (1999). A broad-bandwidth, public-domain, personality inventory measuring the lower-level facets of several five-factor models. In I. Mervielde, I. Deary, F. De Fruyt, & F. Ostendorf (Eds.), Personality Psychology in Europe (Vol. 7, pp. 7–28). Tilburg University Press.
- International Personality Item Pool. A Scientific Collaboratory for the Development of Advanced Measures of Personality Traits and Other Individual Differences. https://ipip.ori.org/
- Paunonen, S. V., & Ashton, M. C. (2001). Big Five factors and facets and the prediction of behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81(3), 524–539.
Sample report preview
The report opens with a profile of your scores on each of the 45 scales, drawn on a common scale so the highest and lowest areas stand out. Each one then receives a short plain-language explanation of what a higher or lower standing describes. It closes with guidance on reading the results and on the limits of self-report.
| Section | What it shows |
|---|---|
| Subscale scores | Your score on each of the 45 subscales. |
| Comparisons | How your scores compare with a published comparison group. |
It is free to take, and the full report with a downloadable copy is $6.
How would you like to use it?
For yourself
Take it yourself and receive a written score report you can download as a PDF. When you are signed in, your results are saved so you can retake it later and follow how your scores change over time.
For researchers
Sign up as an Implicitify researcher to use the full suite of measures in your studies, or pay for each test you give. Research pricing is still being set, so we will confirm it with you when you get in touch.
Become a researcherFor clinicians
Open a clinician account to send this measure to your clients or patients through a secure link and review their scored results in one place.
Create a clinician accountAlready have an account? Go to your clinician dashboard.For educators
Use our measures in your courses to show students how psychological assessment works and to teach the principles of testing.
Request course access