Self-report measure

Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS), In General (Trait Affect)

The 20-item Positive and Negative Affect Schedule, framed as a trait measure: read each word and indicate to what extent you generally feel this way, on average, in your life. Ten words measure Positive Affect (e.g., enthusiasm, alertness, energy) and ten measure Negative Affect (e.g., distress, fear, irritability). Rate each from "Very slightly or not at all" to "Extremely."

Rate how you generally feel across 20 mood adjectives—Positive Affect and Negative Affect scored separately.

You learn the balance of positive and negative feelings you usually have.

For anyone who wants to see their usual emotional tone over time.

Start the test

Pay $5 before you start. The full report and PDF are included.

Your answers stay private.

It comes from emotion research on lasting levels of positive and negative feeling.

Example score profileChart drawn with invented example scores; not a real result.Example data0255075100Positive AffectNegative Affect
Sample result, example data. Illustrative chart with invented scores; it does not describe any real respondent.
Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS), In General (Trait Affect) box

What this test is

Welcome. The 20-item Positive and Negative Affect Schedule, framed as a trait measure: read each word and indicate to what extent you generally feel this way, on average, in your life. Ten words measure Positive Affect (e.g., enthusiasm, alertness, energy) and ten measure Negative Affect (e.g., distress, fear, irritability). Rate each from "Very slightly or not at all" to "Extremely."

Rate how you generally feel across 20 mood adjectives—Positive Affect and Negative Affect scored separately.

The measure

The Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS), In General (Trait Affect) was developed by Watson and colleagues (1988). It has 20 items, each answered on a 5-point (Very slightly or not at all … Extremely) scale. Its scores cover Positive Affect and Negative Affect.

Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063–1070.

At a glance

Items
20
Response scale
5-point (Very slightly or not at all … Extremely)
Est. time
~3 min
Subscales
2
Access
Pay before you start · $5, or $3 to repeat · full report and PDF included
Scales
Positive and negative affect
Time frame
In general

What it measures

Twenty emotion words are rated by how much a person generally feels each one, on average. Ten form the positive affect scale, describing a habitual tendency toward energy, interest and enthusiasm: interested, excited, strong, enthusiastic, proud, alert, inspired, determined, attentive and active. Ten form the negative affect scale, describing a habitual tendency toward distress: distressed, upset, guilty, scared, hostile, irritable, ashamed, nervous, jittery and afraid.

Watson and Tellegen (1985) proposed that mood is organized around two largely independent dimensions, and Watson, Clark and Tellegen (1988) developed the schedule to measure them. Asked about in general, the two dimensions behave as stable traits that relate closely to Extraversion and Neuroticism, the two broad personality domains most concerned with emotion.

Each dimension is scored from its ten words. Higher trait positive affect describes a typical life rich in energy and engagement; higher trait negative affect describes a typical life with more frequent distress, worry and irritability. The two scores are read together, since they are largely independent: high levels of both, for example, describe an emotionally intense life.

The trait form is used in research on personality, well-being and psychopathology, where low positive affect is particularly associated with depression and high negative affect with both anxiety and depression (Clark and Watson, 1991). On this site, the PANAS right-now form describes momentary affect, the Mini-IPIP describes Extraversion and Neuroticism directly, and the WHO-5 Well-Being Index measures recent well-being.

Nomological network

PA and NA were largely uncorrelated with each other. Factorially, two dimensions accounted for virtually all common variance among the 20 descriptors (≈ 87–96% across instruction sets), with items loading ≥ .50 on the intended factor (Watson et al., 1988). Convergently, PANAS PA and NA correlated .89–.95 with corresponding regression-based affect factor scores; discriminantly, cross-correlations were only −.02 to −.18 (Watson et al., 1988). Externally, the scales show the expected nomological pattern with related mood and distress constructs while remaining distinct from each other—supporting PA and NA as separate dimensions rather than opposite poles of one bipolar happiness continuum. Trait instructions show substantial retest stability appropriate to dispositional affect (Watson et al., 1988).

Validity evidence

The two-factor structure is robust across instruction sets and is replicated across diverse adult populations.

Subscales

Positive Affect 10 items

how much you feel enthusiasm, alertness, and energy

Negative Affect 10 items

how much you feel distress and unpleasant emotion

Example item

“Interested”

Very slightly or not at allA littleModeratelyQuite a bitExtremely

Illustrative only. During administration items are presented one screen-set at a time; response-key direction is never shown to respondents.

Scoring & interpretation

Your report explains each of your scale scores in plain language.

Related measures

Common questions

Trait vs state?

This page uses the general/trait instruction. A separate panas-state page uses momentary instructions; both use the same 20 adjectives (Watson et al., 1988).

Is there a total mood score?

No. PA and NA are separate 10-item scales, largely uncorrelated (Watson et al., 1988).

References

  1. Watson, D., Clark, L. A., & Tellegen, A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: The PANAS scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54(6), 1063–1070.
  2. Crawford, J. R., & Henry, J. D. (2004). The Positive and Negative Affect Schedule (PANAS): Construct validity, measurement properties and normative data in a large non-clinical sample. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 43(3), 245-265.
  3. Watson, D., & Clark, L. A. (1994). The PANAS-X: Manual for the Positive and Negative Affect Schedule — Expanded Form. University of Iowa.

Sample report preview

The report opens with a profile of your scores on each of the 2 scales (Positive Affect and Negative Affect), drawn on a common scale so the highest and lowest areas stand out. Each one then receives a short plain-language explanation of what a higher or lower standing describes. It closes with guidance on reading the results and on the limits of self-report.

Report contents
SectionWhat it shows
Subscale scoresYour score on each of the 2 subscales.
ComparisonsHow your scores compare with a published comparison group.

The test and full report with a downloadable copy are $5.

How would you like to use it?

For yourself

Take it yourself and receive a written score report you can download as a PDF. When you are signed in, your results are saved so you can retake it later and follow how your scores change over time.

$5 paid before you start, and $3 for each retake
Take the test

For researchers

Sign up as an Implicitify researcher to use the full suite of measures in your studies, or pay for each test you give. Research pricing is still being set, so we will confirm it with you when you get in touch.

Become a researcher

For clinicians

Open a clinician account to send this measure to your clients or patients through a secure link and review their scored results in one place.

Create a clinician accountAlready have an account? Go to your clinician dashboard.

For educators

Use our measures in your courses to show students how psychological assessment works and to teach the principles of testing.

Request course access
Ask Qualia