Big Five Aspect Scales (BFAS)
The Big Five Aspect Scales (BFAS) use 100 statements from the International Personality Item Pool (IPIP) to assess 10 named scales.
You learn the two aspects behind each of your five traits, such as compassion and politeness within agreeableness.
For anyone who wants to see the two sides inside each of their big personality traits.
Report and PDF $7, paid after you finish.
Your answers stay private.
It comes from personality research that splits each of the five big traits into two aspects.
What this test is
Welcome. The Big Five Aspect Scales (BFAS) use 100 statements from the International Personality Item Pool (IPIP) to assess 10 named scales.
The measure
The Big Five Aspect Scales (BFAS) was developed by DeYoung and colleagues (2007). It has 100 items, each answered on a 5-point (Very Inaccurate … Very Accurate) scale. Its scores cover Volatility, Withdrawal, Compassion, Politeness, Industriousness, Orderliness, Enthusiasm, Assertiveness, Intellect and Openness.
DeYoung, C. G., Quilty, L. C., & Peterson, J. B. (2007). Between facets and domains: 10 aspects of the Big Five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93, 880–896. Items via the International Personality Item Pool (ipip.ori.org).
At a glance
What it measures
A person who is quick to anger and a person who is quick to feel discouraged can both score high on Neuroticism, yet they do not experience the same difficulties.
DeYoung, Quilty and Peterson (2007) identified this level of the trait hierarchy by factor analyzing the facets of two large inventories and finding that, within each domain, the facets consistently formed two correlated clusters. They interpreted the aspects as a level between the broad domains and the many narrow facets, and as a level that may correspond more closely to distinct underlying systems than either (DeYoung, 2015). The scales were written with items from the public-domain International Personality Item Pool (IPIP; Goldberg, 1999), which allows them to be used without proprietary questionnaires.
Each aspect is scored separately from ten items, and the two aspects within a domain can be read together to show how that domain divides for a given person. Higher scores on an aspect describe a stronger and more consistent version of the tendency it names; lower scores describe its relative absence, which is not a deficit. Because the aspects within a domain are only moderately related, two people with the same domain score may differ markedly at the aspect level, and the report draws attention to such splits.
The aspects are used in research on motivation, emotion regulation, creativity and the biological bases of personality, and in personal development and coaching as a finer-grained description than five domain scores alone. Readers who want only the five domains can take the brief Mini-IPIP; those who want narrower facets can take the IPIP-NEO-120, which scores thirty facets; and the IPIP-HEXACO adds a sixth broad dimension, Honesty-Humility.
Validity evidence
The 10 aspects sit between facets and domains in the Big Five hierarchy and show incremental predictive validity over domain scores for multiple criteria. Confirmatory factor analyses support the two-aspect-per-domain structure within each domain (DeYoung et al., 2007; DeYoung, 2006).
Subscales
Volatility 10 items
how readily you feel and show negative emotion
Withdrawal 10 items
how prone you are to anxiety, worry, and discouragement
Compassion 10 items
how much you care about and connect with others' feelings
Politeness 10 items
how respectful and considerate you are of others
Industriousness 10 items
how hard-working and goal-focused you are
Orderliness 10 items
how much you seek order, routine, and tidiness
Enthusiasm 10 items
how sociable, warm, and outgoing you are
Assertiveness 10 items
how forceful, take-charge, and driven you are
Intellect 10 items
how engaged you are with ideas and abstract problems
Openness 10 items
how drawn you are to art, beauty, and imagination
Example item
“Get angry easily.”
Illustrative only. During administration items are presented one screen-set at a time; response-key direction is never shown to respondents.
Scoring & interpretation
Your report explains each of your scale scores in plain language.
References
- DeYoung, C. G., Quilty, L. C., & Peterson, J. B. (2007). Between facets and domains: 10 aspects of the Big Five. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 93(5), 880-896.
- DeYoung, C. G. (2006). Higher-order factors of the Big Five in a multi-informant sample. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91(6), 1138-1151.
Sample report preview
The report opens with a profile of your scores on each of the 10 scales, drawn on a common scale so the highest and lowest areas stand out. Each one then receives a short plain-language explanation of what a higher or lower standing describes. It closes with guidance on reading the results and on the limits of self-report.
| Section | What it shows |
|---|---|
| Subscale scores | Your score on each of the 10 subscales. |
| Comparisons | How your scores compare with a published comparison group. |
It is free to take, and the full report with a downloadable copy is $7.
How would you like to use it?
For yourself
Take it yourself and receive a written score report you can download as a PDF. When you are signed in, your results are saved so you can retake it later and follow how your scores change over time.
For researchers
Sign up as an Implicitify researcher to use the full suite of measures in your studies, or pay for each test you give. Research pricing is still being set, so we will confirm it with you when you get in touch.
Become a researcherFor clinicians
Open a clinician account to send this measure to your clients or patients through a secure link and review their scored results in one place.
Create a clinician accountAlready have an account? Go to your clinician dashboard.For educators
Use our measures in your courses to show students how psychological assessment works and to teach the principles of testing.
Request course access