Self-report measure

Abridged Big-Five Circumplex (AB5C)

AB5C uses 485 International Personality Item Pool statements to assess 45 named scales. Respondents complete 485 items using 1–5 ratings. Keyed responses are summed separately for each reported scale.

At a glance

Items
485
Response scale
5-point (Very Inaccurate … Very Accurate)
Est. time
~69 min
Subscales
45
Norms
Referenced (N = 795)
Access
Free, self-serve

What it measures

This is the full IPIP AB5C collection: 45 scales and 485 public-domain items measuring the facets of the Abridged Big Five Circumplex (Hofstee, de Raad, & Goldberg, 1992), in which each facet is a blend of its two strongest Big Five components. The circumplex approach captures trait shadings — for example, sociability colored by assertiveness versus sociability colored by warmth — that a five-score summary flattens out.

Origins and lineage

By the early 1990s two geometries competed for describing trait space. Simple structure assigns each trait to exactly one factor — tidy, but false to the many terms that plainly mix factors. Circumplex models arrange traits continuously around factor pairs — faithful to blends, but hard to extend past two dimensions. Hofstee, de Raad, and Goldberg (1992) proposed the Abridged Big Five Circumplex as the integration: keep the Big Five as reference axes (Goldberg, 1990), and characterize every trait by its two strongest factor loadings, primary and secondary, each with sign.

That bookkeeping yields 45 facet cells — five 'pure' factor facets plus forty two-factor blends — and the IPIP assembled a public-domain scale for each cell (Goldberg, 1999). The payoff is interpretive precision at the level where everyday trait words actually live.

The IPIP representation administered here

These 45 scales are the AB5C model's native public-domain operationalization — original IPIP items keyed to the circumplex cells, not a version of some proprietary inventory. Scale membership and reverse-keying are taken verbatim from Goldberg's IPIP multi-scale map (ScalesFor967items), with construct names as catalogued at ipip.ori.org.

All 45 facets are reported against Eugene–Springfield Community Sample reference values in the norms section. Its length makes it a research and deep-self-study instrument rather than a quick profile.

Subscales

Emotional Stability (high) + Agreeableness (high) 10 items

Conscientiousness (high) 13 items

Agreeableness (high) + Conscientiousness (high) 12 items

Extraversion (high) + Agreeableness (high) 10 items

Extraversion (high) + Conscientiousness (low) 10 items

Emotional Stability (high) + Extraversion (high) 10 items

Emotional Stability (high) + Conscientiousness (low) 10 items

Emotional Stability (high) + Conscientiousness (high) 10 items

Intellect/Imagination (high) + Emotional Stability (high) 10 items

Extraversion (high) + Intellect/Imagination (high) 10 items

Extraversion (high) + Conscientiousness (high) 12 items

Emotional Stability (high) + Intellect/Imagination (low) 11 items

Conscientiousness (high) + Emotional Stability (high) 12 items

Emotional Stability (high) + Intellect/Imagination (high) 12 items

Extraversion (high) + Emotional Stability (high) 10 items

Agreeableness (high) + Conscientiousness (low) 12 items

Emotional Stability (high) 10 items

Emotional Stability (high) + Extraversion (low) 11 items

Emotional Stability (high) + Agreeableness (low) 9 items

Conscientiousness (high) + Extraversion (low) 12 items

Agreeableness (high) + Emotional Stability (high) 12 items

Conscientiousness (high) + Extraversion (high) 11 items

Intellect/Imagination (high) + Extraversion (high) 9 items

Agreeableness (high) 10 items

Agreeableness (high) + Extraversion (high) 11 items

Extraversion (high) + Agreeableness (low) 11 items

Conscientiousness (high) + Agreeableness (low) 14 items

Conscientiousness (high) + Emotional Stability (low) 9 items

Agreeableness (high) + Intellect/Imagination (high) 9 items

Intellect/Imagination (high) 11 items

Intellect/Imagination (high) + Agreeableness (low) 10 items

Extraversion (high) 10 items

Extraversion (high) + Intellect/Imagination (low) 10 items

Conscientiousness (high) + Agreeableness (high) 13 items

Agreeableness (high) + Emotional Stability (low) 13 items

Intellect/Imagination (high) + Conscientiousness (low) 10 items

Agreeableness (high) + Intellect/Imagination (low) 13 items

Intellect/Imagination (high) + Extraversion (low) 12 items

Agreeableness (high) + Extraversion (low) 12 items

Conscientiousness (high) + Intellect/Imagination (high) 12 items

Extraversion (high) + Emotional Stability (low) 10 items

Conscientiousness (high) + Intellect/Imagination (low) 10 items

Intellect/Imagination (high) + Agreeableness (high) 10 items

Intellect/Imagination (high) + Emotional Stability (low) 9 items

Intellect/Imagination (high) + Conscientiousness (high) 8 items

Example item

“Accept people as they are.”

Very InaccurateModerately InaccurateNeither Accurate nor InaccurateModerately AccurateVery Accurate

Illustrative only. During administration items are presented one screen-set at a time; response-key direction is never shown to respondents.

Scoring & interpretation

Item responses are summed within each scale (reverse-keyed items recoded first) and expressed as a population percentile against the cited reference sample, with a reliability-based confidence range where α is published.

Psychometrics & norms

ScaleMSDNαMetric
Emotional Stability (high) + Agreeableness (high)37.356.635700.83summed raw
Conscientiousness (high)52.126.315700.74summed raw
Agreeableness (high) + Conscientiousness (high)50.735.415700.72summed raw
Extraversion (high) + Agreeableness (high)34.577.216000.85summed raw
Extraversion (high) + Conscientiousness (low)29.976.456000.76summed raw
Emotional Stability (high) + Extraversion (high)36.966.876000.85summed raw
Emotional Stability (high) + Conscientiousness (low)28.295.507950.69summed raw
Intellect/Imagination (high) + Emotional Stability (high)39.196.035700.84summed raw
Extraversion (high) + Intellect/Imagination (high)33.646.566000.82summed raw
Extraversion (high) + Conscientiousness (high)41.615.575700.64summed raw
Emotional Stability (high) + Intellect/Imagination (low)32.046.515700.76summed raw
Conscientiousness (high) + Emotional Stability (high)46.116.596000.82summed raw
Emotional Stability (high) + Intellect/Imagination (high)43.407.506460.83summed raw
Extraversion (high) + Emotional Stability (high)36.166.376000.81summed raw
Emotional Stability (high)35.236.986000.85summed raw
Emotional Stability (high) + Extraversion (low)39.956.646450.78summed raw
Emotional Stability (high) + Agreeableness (low)30.577.146000.84summed raw
Conscientiousness (high) + Extraversion (low)38.566.865700.76summed raw
Agreeableness (high) + Emotional Stability (high)45.466.015700.76summed raw
Conscientiousness (high) + Extraversion (high)41.286.895700.83summed raw
Intellect/Imagination (high) + Extraversion (high)33.015.886000.82summed raw
Agreeableness (high)41.595.006000.81summed raw
Agreeableness (high) + Extraversion (high)44.825.895700.83summed raw
Extraversion (high) + Agreeableness (low)27.626.045700.72summed raw
Conscientiousness (high) + Agreeableness (low)47.416.455700.67summed raw
Conscientiousness (high) + Emotional Stability (low)29.624.556450.57summed raw
Agreeableness (high) + Intellect/Imagination (high)36.754.115700.69summed raw
Intellect/Imagination (high)42.156.565700.81summed raw
Intellect/Imagination (high) + Agreeableness (low)34.386.726000.81summed raw
Extraversion (high)28.697.226000.82summed raw
Extraversion (high) + Intellect/Imagination (low)24.285.365700.67summed raw
Intellect/Imagination (high) + Conscientiousness (low)35.786.676260.78summed raw
Agreeableness (high) + Intellect/Imagination (low)49.856.216000.72summed raw
Intellect/Imagination (high) + Extraversion (low)43.155.845700.71summed raw
Agreeableness (high) + Extraversion (low)49.446.105700.73summed raw
Conscientiousness (high) + Intellect/Imagination (high)49.255.415700.78summed raw
Extraversion (high) + Emotional Stability (low)22.496.986000.84summed raw
Conscientiousness (high) + Intellect/Imagination (low)37.456.096000.79summed raw
Intellect/Imagination (high) + Emotional Stability (low)32.005.726450.76summed raw
Intellect/Imagination (high) + Conscientiousness (high)31.933.977950.74summed raw

Norms computed from the Eugene-Springfield Community Sample (ESCS) — Lewis R. Goldberg’s adult community panel from Eugene and Springfield, Oregon (Harvard Dataverse, doi:10.7910/DVN/UF52WY). This is a community sample and is NOT nationally representative. The mean, standard deviation, reference N and Cronbach’s α were computed directly from the raw IPIP item-level responses on THIS scale’s exact item set and reverse-keying (complete cases); reference N varies by scale and is shown with each scale below. The confidence range uses the standard error of measurement (SEM = SD·√(1−α)) from that computed α.

Source & citation

Public-domain items from the International Personality Item Pool (Goldberg, L. R., 1999; ipip.ori.org). Scale membership and reverse-keying taken verbatim from Goldberg's IPIP multi-scale map (ScalesFor967items). Construct names from ipip.ori.org.

References

  1. Hofstee, W. K. B., de Raad, B., & Goldberg, L. R. (1992). Integration of the Big Five and circumplex approaches to trait structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(1), 146–163.
  2. Goldberg, L. R. (1990). An alternative 'description of personality': The Big-Five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(6), 1216–1229.
  3. Goldberg, L. R. (1999). A broad-bandwidth, public-domain, personality inventory measuring the lower-level facets of several five-factor models. In I. Mervielde, I. Deary, F. De Fruyt, & F. Ostendorf (Eds.), Personality Psychology in Europe (Vol. 7, pp. 7–28). Tilburg University Press.
  4. International Personality Item Pool. A Scientific Collaboratory for the Development of Advanced Measures of Personality Traits and Other Individual Differences. https://ipip.ori.org/