Abridged Big-Five Circumplex (AB5C)
The Abridged Big Five Circumplex (AB5C) uses 485 statements from the International Personality Item Pool (IPIP) to assess 45 named scales.
You learn your standing on dozens of blended trait facets that sharpen your five-trait profile.
For anyone who wants a finer-grained picture of their personality than five broad traits.
Report and PDF $7, paid after you finish.
Your answers stay private.
It comes from personality research that blends pairs of the five big traits into more specific facets.
What this test is
Welcome. The Abridged Big Five Circumplex (AB5C) uses 485 statements from the International Personality Item Pool (IPIP) to assess 45 named scales.
The measure
It has 485 items, each answered on a 5-point (Very Inaccurate … Very Accurate) scale. Its scores cover 45 separate scales.
Public-domain items from the International Personality Item Pool (Goldberg, L. R., 1999; ipip.ori.org). Scale membership and reverse-keying taken verbatim from Goldberg's IPIP multi-scale map (ScalesFor967items). Construct names from ipip.ori.org.
At a glance
What it measures
Many familiar traits are blends rather than pure examples of one broad factor. Warmth combines Extraversion with Agreeableness; calm efficiency combines Emotional Stability with Conscientiousness; quick wit combines Extraversion with Intellect. The Abridged Big Five Circumplex (AB5C) describes personality with forty-five such blends, each defined by the two factors it draws on most and by the direction, high or low, of each. Its 485 statements give a detailed portrait of how the five broad tendencies combine in a particular person.
Hofstee, de Raad and Goldberg (1992) proposed the model after observing that trait words rarely fall neatly on a single factor. They arranged traits in circles defined by every pair of the five factors, abridged to the blends that are well represented in language. Goldberg (1999) wrote statement versions of the forty-five facets for the public-domain International Personality Item Pool (IPIP).
Each blend is scored separately. A high score on a blend describes a person who shows both of its defining tendencies in the named directions; a low score describes the opposite combination. The report groups the blends by their primary factor, so that the familiar five domains remain visible while the blends show the particular colors each takes on for this person.
The circumplex is used in personality research on trait structure and in detailed personal assessment. On this site, the Big-Five Factor Markers and Big-Five Factor Markers (100) measure the five factors directly, the Big Five Aspect Scales (BFAS) divide each factor in two, and the Interpersonal Circumplex (IPC-32) applies circular structure to interpersonal behavior.
Origins and lineage
By the early 1990s two geometries competed for describing trait space. Simple structure assigns each trait to exactly one factor — tidy, but false to the many terms that plainly mix factors. Circumplex models arrange traits continuously around factor pairs — faithful to blends, but hard to extend past two dimensions. Hofstee, de Raad, and Goldberg (1992) proposed the Abridged Big Five Circumplex as the integration: keep the Big Five as reference axes (Goldberg, 1990), and characterize every trait by its two strongest factor loadings, primary and secondary, each with sign.
That bookkeeping yields 45 facet cells — five 'pure' factor facets plus forty two-factor blends — and the IPIP assembled a public-domain scale for each cell (Goldberg, 1999). The payoff is interpretive precision at the level where everyday trait words actually live.
The International Personality Item Pool (IPIP) version used here
These 45 scales are the AB5C model's native public-domain operationalization — original IPIP items keyed to the circumplex cells, not a version of some proprietary inventory. Scale membership and reverse-keying are taken verbatim from Goldberg's IPIP multi-scale map (ScalesFor967items), with construct names as catalogued at ipip.ori.org.
Its length makes it a research and deep-self-study instrument rather than a quick profile.
Nomological network
The Abridged Big Five Circumplex describes traits as blends of two of the five broad factors, so that, for example, warmth sits between Extraversion and Agreeableness (Hofstee et al., 1992). This approach links the five-factor model with circumplex models of interpersonal behavior (Hofstee et al., 1992).
Because each scale blends two factors, neighboring scales are related and scales on opposite sides of a circle are inversely related, which is the pattern of convergence and discrimination the model predicts (Hofstee et al., 1992). The public-domain scales converge with their commercial counterparts (Goldberg et al., 2006).
Subscales
Emotional Stability (high) + Agreeableness (high) 10 items
Conscientiousness (high) 13 items
Agreeableness (high) + Conscientiousness (high) 12 items
Extraversion (high) + Agreeableness (high) 10 items
Extraversion (high) + Conscientiousness (low) 10 items
Emotional Stability (high) + Extraversion (high) 10 items
Emotional Stability (high) + Conscientiousness (low) 10 items
Emotional Stability (high) + Conscientiousness (high) 10 items
Intellect/Imagination (high) + Emotional Stability (high) 10 items
Extraversion (high) + Intellect/Imagination (high) 10 items
Extraversion (high) + Conscientiousness (high) 12 items
Emotional Stability (high) + Intellect/Imagination (low) 11 items
Conscientiousness (high) + Emotional Stability (high) 12 items
Emotional Stability (high) + Intellect/Imagination (high) 12 items
Extraversion (high) + Emotional Stability (high) 10 items
Agreeableness (high) + Conscientiousness (low) 12 items
Emotional Stability (high) 10 items
Emotional Stability (high) + Extraversion (low) 11 items
Emotional Stability (high) + Agreeableness (low) 9 items
Conscientiousness (high) + Extraversion (low) 12 items
Agreeableness (high) + Emotional Stability (high) 12 items
Conscientiousness (high) + Extraversion (high) 11 items
Intellect/Imagination (high) + Extraversion (high) 9 items
Agreeableness (high) 10 items
Agreeableness (high) + Extraversion (high) 11 items
Extraversion (high) + Agreeableness (low) 11 items
Conscientiousness (high) + Agreeableness (low) 14 items
Conscientiousness (high) + Emotional Stability (low) 9 items
Agreeableness (high) + Intellect/Imagination (high) 9 items
Intellect/Imagination (high) 11 items
Intellect/Imagination (high) + Agreeableness (low) 10 items
Extraversion (high) 10 items
Extraversion (high) + Intellect/Imagination (low) 10 items
Conscientiousness (high) + Agreeableness (high) 13 items
Agreeableness (high) + Emotional Stability (low) 13 items
Intellect/Imagination (high) + Conscientiousness (low) 10 items
Agreeableness (high) + Intellect/Imagination (low) 13 items
Intellect/Imagination (high) + Extraversion (low) 12 items
Agreeableness (high) + Extraversion (low) 12 items
Conscientiousness (high) + Intellect/Imagination (high) 12 items
Extraversion (high) + Emotional Stability (low) 10 items
Conscientiousness (high) + Intellect/Imagination (low) 10 items
Intellect/Imagination (high) + Agreeableness (high) 10 items
Intellect/Imagination (high) + Emotional Stability (low) 9 items
Intellect/Imagination (high) + Conscientiousness (high) 8 items
Example item
“Accept people as they are.”
Illustrative only. During administration items are presented one screen-set at a time; response-key direction is never shown to respondents.
Scoring & interpretation
Your report explains each of your scale scores in plain language.
References
- Hofstee, W. K. B., de Raad, B., & Goldberg, L. R. (1992). Integration of the Big Five and circumplex approaches to trait structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 63(1), 146–163.
- Goldberg, L. R. (1990). An alternative 'description of personality': The Big-Five factor structure. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(6), 1216–1229.
- Goldberg, L. R. (1999). A broad-bandwidth, public-domain, personality inventory measuring the lower-level facets of several five-factor models. In I. Mervielde, I. Deary, F. De Fruyt, & F. Ostendorf (Eds.), Personality Psychology in Europe (Vol. 7, pp. 7–28). Tilburg University Press.
- International Personality Item Pool. A Scientific Collaboratory for the Development of Advanced Measures of Personality Traits and Other Individual Differences. https://ipip.ori.org/
- Goldberg, L. R., Johnson, J. A., Eber, H. W., Hogan, R., Ashton, M. C., Cloninger, C. R., & Gough, H. G. (2006). The International Personality Item Pool and the future of public-domain personality measures. Journal of Research in Personality, 40(1), 84–96.
Sample report preview
The report opens with a profile of your scores on each of the 45 scales, drawn on a common scale so the highest and lowest areas stand out. Each one then receives a short plain-language explanation of what a higher or lower standing describes. It closes with guidance on reading the results and on the limits of self-report.
| Section | What it shows |
|---|---|
| Subscale scores | Your score on each of the 45 subscales. |
| Comparisons | How your scores compare with a published comparison group. |
It is free to take, and the full report with a downloadable copy is $7.
How would you like to use it?
For yourself
Take it yourself and receive a written score report you can download as a PDF. When you are signed in, your results are saved so you can retake it later and follow how your scores change over time.
For researchers
Sign up as an Implicitify researcher to use the full suite of measures in your studies, or pay for each test you give. Research pricing is still being set, so we will confirm it with you when you get in touch.
Become a researcherFor clinicians
Open a clinician account to send this measure to your clients or patients through a secure link and review their scored results in one place.
Create a clinician accountAlready have an account? Go to your clinician dashboard.For educators
Use our measures in your courses to show students how psychological assessment works and to teach the principles of testing.
Request course access